STAR WARS Actor John Boyega Sends Superhero Speculation Into Overdrive With New Social Media Posts
Related:

STAR WARS Actor John Boyega Sends Superhero Speculation Into Overdrive With New Social Media Posts

STAR WARS: Cal Kestis Live-Action Debut Rumored; Will THE MANDALORIAN & GROGU Return After Upcoming Movie?
Recommended For You:

STAR WARS: Cal Kestis Live-Action Debut Rumored; Will THE MANDALORIAN & GROGU Return After Upcoming Movie?

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6
TheSoulEater
TheSoulEater - 12/16/2016, 9:40 AM
Gonna have to disagree with you there.

I loved Krennick, not since Tarkin have I had an antagonistic Imperial who's actually concomitant, and somewhat formidable seeming due to it.

Also, I did like the characters , even with what little time they were given.
pesmerga44
pesmerga44 - 12/16/2016, 1:48 PM
@TheSoulEater - I completely disagree I felt he was ineffective as a villain. He felt whiny and incompetent especially when Tarkin just comes in and takes control of the Death Star from him. Later when he was summoned by Vader he looked a lot like a child running to mommy to tattle on his brother for taking his things. I found nothing about him made him a good villain in the slightest. He felt more like a lackey to the movie's villain then the actual villain.
Nerdman3000
Nerdman3000 - 12/16/2016, 3:03 PM
@pesmerga44 - To be honest, having read the Rogue One prequel novelization Catalyst, I actually liked his character. Admittedly the novel expands his character a lot more, so perhaps that's why I enjoyed him, but I did.
pesmerga44
pesmerga44 - 12/16/2016, 5:22 PM
@Nerdman3000 - Well the first act did feel like it was edited a lot which is probably where the reports of extensive re-shoots came from. Maybe there is a cut where it makes him look more effective as a villain but the cut we got in the theater maybe him look incompetent and completely nonthreatening. Like the scene after they test the Death Star and Tarkin calls him out on his incompetence that info about the Death Star was leaked on his watch. He stood there dumbfounded and then went on how he deserves to have the Emperor know he did a good job. It came off childish. Lastly if the book expanded his character that is all great the only problem is I am watching a movie and they expect me to read a book to understand their characters the movie has failed on that part.
pesmerga44
pesmerga44 - 12/16/2016, 6:35 PM
@Nerdman3000 - Funny enough the more I think about I actually find Krennick to be almost a non factor in the movie. Like after he takes Galen in to help build the Death Star what does he do in the movie. Does he do anything to confront the heroes really he does nothing. He spends most of the movie getting bitch slapped around by Tarkin and whining to people why he isn't getting the recognition he deserves. By the time we get to the present the movie is set in the Death Star is built. There is no race to stop the Death Star from being built. There is no confrontation to get the last remaining piece, crystal, McGuffin or what ever the Death Star needs. Hell he doesn't even go after the Rebels. He doesn't even know who Felicity Jones is until she tells him at the end. As the villain of the movie he was such a non factor to the plot it is actually funny they even have him in the movie at all.
TheSoulEater
TheSoulEater - 12/18/2016, 10:39 AM
@pesmerga44 -

Krennick got things done, why he was upset was because while he had run an efficient ship, he was blind to Erso's treachery. That one mistake was what sunk him, I didn't chalk that to incompetence so much as a testament to the cleverness of Erso himself.

Him being upset that Tarkin swooped in and took his position seemed if anything understandable. It's classic corporate/military bullshit.

A guy who hasn't been in charge comes in when things have been mostly swimming thus far, takes all the credit for your success and leaves you holding the bag for all the faults.

Also he didn't run off like a child to Lord Vader, he was summoned there, no one really WANTS to bring Vader bad news. So he seemed like a frightened child from that aspect more than a whining one.

Your always half pleading for your life in his presence anyway and making sure he knows that the weakness he sees isn't your fault or he'll cut you out even if your only indirectly involved. Or how many imperial officers do you know of who have lived through such?

He put allot of time and effort into the Death Star being a success so him still vieing for resuming control of it was understandable after hearing the open ended comment Vader meant about being in command still.

He didn't feel like a lacky so much as a corporately shafted major who was trying to work with what he had, and seemed to be be the only one awares of what to do and unlike other officers who gawk at things, and just gives orders.

He was on the ground himself with his own troops making sure shit got done, he even was the one who shot Captain Cassian.

It was refreshing to see a admiral figure seen as someone who was hands on and actually invested in his job as opposed to the "council of snobs" that every other military imperial i've seen has been.
BloodyBed
BloodyBed - 12/16/2016, 9:41 AM
josh masturbates to starting flame wars, spoiling movies the day they come out, next lists, and boss logic artwork.

:D
LEOSTRATOR
LEOSTRATOR - 12/16/2016, 9:44 AM
My friend told me the only good thing about this movie was Donnie Yen. Other than that, straight garbage.
TruePunishment
TruePunishment - 12/16/2016, 10:44 AM
@LEOSTRATOR - Your friend is either a liar, a moron, or both.
BloodyBed
BloodyBed - 12/16/2016, 10:53 AM
@LEOSTRATOR - let me guess, yen had the coolest fight scenes?

don't actually answer that, i haven't seen the movie.
Sxcory
Sxcory - 12/16/2016, 9:48 AM
Tarkin was great. You're crazy if you think that CGI was bad.
ELAYEM
ELAYEM - 12/16/2016, 10:19 AM
@Sxcory - Yeah opposite to Josh I thought Tarkin looked perfect, Leia looked more iffy
soberchimera
soberchimera - 12/16/2016, 10:34 AM
@Elayem - Leia looked like a Shrek character.
StormXmen123
StormXmen123 - 12/16/2016, 10:43 AM
@Elayem - I havent seen the film yet but I have seen images of both characters (though admitly not HD quality) but I agree,Leia looks cgi and Tarking looks better.

I think it simply because Leia is younger, and the smoother face makes us associate her with game characters/ real human.

Tarkin has a unique bones structure which is quite uncommon in most people so we dont really have mnay refrences to go by and doesnt look that jarring.

Honestly the only thin that bugs me is that disney preaches real, practical effects (which I dont have a problem with its just that they constantly go on and on about it) but they they turn to cgi at every given stage.
DrFreudstein
DrFreudstein - 12/16/2016, 10:52 AM
@StormXmen123 - Images don't really give a great idea of how poorly it works. Something about the way his mouth moves when he talks is super uncanny valley and personally pulled me out of those scenes. It's just annoying because they didn't even bother to hide it with creative lighting or mix digital and practical effects. They just put him out there and for me it didn't really work. It;s frustrating too because he actually has a pretty cool role in the movie so it's annoying to have the distracting CG in there. Great movie overall though.
Joulipous
Joulipous - 12/16/2016, 11:00 AM
@StormXmen123 - I think what is more worrisome is the moral implications of using a dead actor's likeness for a real performance in a film. It is nowhere near the same as a cameo.

Though the technology is exciting it does raise the question if something like this is ethically responsible. Ofcourse, one could argue that with a studio owning a fictional character, even though that character has the physical appearance of a non-fictional person, that studio should be allowed to use that character as liberal as they want.
Batman5
Batman5 - 12/16/2016, 11:18 AM
@Joulipous - his estate agreed and wanted them to use his character in the movie. If they had not agreed they would have went another route so it's not like they did it without permission.

Also I thought tarkin looked great, and so did Leia. Yea she looked a little weird but it was due to how young she appeared.
StormXmen123
StormXmen123 - 12/16/2016, 11:44 AM
@Joulipous - I thought about the morals to. Whats to stop them taking a living actor/actress likeness (say Dasiy Ridely didnt want to return) and having another actress motion capture her. (I dont think the technology is there just yet however).

With dead actors I think it is more leanient. Additionally many of star wars actors have signed their likeness to to Lucasfilm. I dont think there is a difference for adapting Tarkins likeness to Rebels over a feature film.

shadearts
shadearts - 12/16/2016, 11:45 AM
@Sxcory - I got to agree Tarkin look good i barely notice he was CGI i actually forgot he was now when the show Leia it threw me off because i was expecting CGI because i knew of Leia it still look good for her too. I wonder did they use her daughter as live stand-in
DENNISsystem
DENNISsystem - 12/16/2016, 12:56 PM
@Sxcory - not even close. It was jarring every time he was on screen
AwesomePromoz
AwesomePromoz - 12/16/2016, 4:25 PM
The later scenes of Moff T were better than the earlier things, but I had problems with:

1) His body moved like a crappy cut scene from a video game

2) He is always just standing around waiting for Krennick to come see him; doesn't he do anything besides stand around? As an acting teacher myself, the feeling of what happened immediately before the scene is what makes a performance believable.

Using a talented body double and replacing the face would have been way better.

Leia's cameo was fine though.
1 2 3 4 5 6
FOLLOW ComicBookMovie.com
View Recorder