@TheClungerine - Erica Durance did a great job as Lois aswell. She was just too hot lol.

@ObserverIO -

I love the 90s too. That's when I hit it big in the giant soulless corporation I spent 35 years working for.

The 70s were the best. I can even remember a lot of it.

@DravenCorvis - Do you ever get bored of this one-sided obsession? I mean, we're a rare website with a REALLY active comments section and a LOT to talk about and it seems 90% of yours are about...me? Heck, I've just looked at your profile and you've written an entire bio about me! Seriously?! You're well aware I have you blocked (at least I did until today) so you're talking to yourself which makes the whole thing even stranger.

You frequently mention typos, factual errors, etc. but, from what I've seen, fail to point them out. Then you refer to "unprofessional takes" and cite an opinion piece as an example, completely invalidating your argument because it boils down to ME having a different opinion than YOU.

Perhaps the reason I land interviews (FYI, I don't reach out for them - that's not how it works), get quoted in TV spots, and featured on the covers of Blu-ray cases and materials for Emmy campaigns - when studios have hundreds of options to choose from - is because this perception you have of me is just that: YOUR perception. Every talent has representation who vets a potential interviewee and I can count on one hand the number of times I've been turned down...and it's usually because they're a huge star doing very limited press.

I know this likely goes back to Nate banning your account (yes, yes, you're a lovely, kind gentleman who called me a "b*tch" and c*nt" from memory), but move on, man. Several users who send me the odd screenshot of your comments have made me aware that you've become a bit of a joke around here but I'm not gonna pile on because I feel like you may have mental health issues and, as someone who knows people who suffer with those, I'm not gonna start tearing into you.

I feel like maybe your hope is that, somehow, by constantly posting negatively about me you might somehow tarnish my reputation, rally the commenters to your side, or get me fired...honestly, I think you just need to try and enjoy commenting here again. If you've got constructive feedback to share, go for it - I post hundreds of articles a month and probably 5x more than any other user, so I always appreciate users who point out mistakes, etc. This obsession isn't healthy, though.

@JoshWilding - I think he likes your maracas.

@ProfessorWhy - Nah. His Clark Kent was excellent.And his Superman was fairly close to the modern comics. SHow didn't have a budget to do the Superman stuff, but Dean Cain is a favorite to many of us.

@Beer85 - I felt the show's Clark was too lectury.

@Deadinside - The S curl for one thing and doing a bit less of the naive-boy stuff at times. His Superman is very underrated though, and better than any live action version of the last 40 years.

@Deadinside - yes and the show made a mistake when they made the S symbol come from Krypton instead of being created by Clark, and when they put Clark in glasses before he created the Superman persona.

Clark is supposed to create the Superman costumed persona and then the mild mannered reporter disguise, the show does it backwards.

Still, the first two seasons were great, and the later seasons still had good episodes, even though it was a mistake to do away with the secret identity and let Lois know.

@Deadinside - in the original Christopher Reeve Superman film, actor Marlon Brando insisted on wearing the S symbol, even though his character, Jor El, did not wear it. Because he was such of a famous, powerful actor, the filmmakers gave into his whims, and decided to write the S as being a crest on Krypton to accommodate him so he could wear it. It was still always an S symbol created by Clark on earth in the comics at that time and up until the mid 2000s, where it was changed to being from Krypton, unfortunately, by writer Mark Waid in Birthright (an okay origin, but John Byrne's is still the very best to this day and the most in line with what Superman's creators did). This still wouldn't be adapted in main continuity though until the 2010s, and they have tried to mantain it since then, but it actually makes less sense that it is an alien symbol from Krypton and not an S from earth, and shoves loads of unnecessary contrivance and coincidence into the story that frankly only serves to undermime the credibility of the character. Clark being named "Superman" by the media and creating his costume and S symbol around that and owning the name makes more sense than the S coincidentally coming from Krypton. Why would Clark even wear a symbol from Krypton considering he only lived on it for a few days as a baby, has no memory of it, and didn't even know he was an alien in the comics until years into his costumed Superman career, well into adulthood. Why would Jor El pack him an adult sized outfit but not any baby clothes, especially during a sudden emergency where they have to put baby Kal El into an experimental ship to save him from the planet exploding. It just doesn't make any sense that way. Superman's creators got it right the first time: it is supposed to be an S that Clark created to stand for Superman along with the rest of the suit. Hopefully the live action, comics, and animation people get back to that soon.

@HermanM - He’d wear it to honor his heritage, that same heritage that gives him the power to help people. Plus the idea that it means hope speaks volumes too.

@newhire13 - Haven't seen it in years, but now, I'll have to go find that episode...! ☮️👍

@tvor03 -

Yes they are

@HerrmanM - Yeah, if diversity is so great then go for an evening walk in Baltimore cupcake.